The history and legacy of the landmark Treaty of New Echota

The history and legacy of the landmark Treaty of New Echota

Tribal leaders have renewed calls for a place in the U.S. House of Representatives, a unique provision of the landmark Treaty of New Echota. Here’s how it came to be.

Published October 5, 2022

8 min read

Nearly 200 years ago, the United States signed a treaty with the Cherokee people, bartering away the tribe’s ancestral homelands for a far-off reservation and putting the forced migration now known as the Trail of Tears into motion.

Even though the 1835 Treaty of New Echota was just one of the 375 acknowledged agreements between the U.S. and Tribal governments, it contained a unique provision: a line that promised the Cherokee people a delegate to the House of Representatives.

Now, the Cherokee Nation is calling on the U.S. government to make good on that promise by seating the nation’s first-ever Cherokee delegate: Kim Teehee, the tribe’s director of government relations and a former Native policy advisor for President Barack Obama. (Subscriber exclusive: North America’s Native nations reassert their sovereignty: “We are here.”)

But is the controversial treaty still valid—and why did the Cherokee sign it in the first place? Here’s what you need to know.

Early settlers clamor for Cherokee land

When European settlers arrived in North America in the 16th century, they encountered Cherokee people who lived in what is now the southeastern portion of the U.S. In the late 17th century, white settlers began clamoring for access to Cherokee lands, which included vast hunting grounds and fertile farmland. Those calls only grew louder with the expansion of the newly formed U.S. in the late 18th and early 19th century.

Slowly, federal and state governments pushed to both demarcate and erode Native-held lands, promising financial assistance and peace in exchange for increasing swaths of land. The Cherokee resisted, even forming a centralized tribal government modeled on the young U.S. government and adopting a written constitution. (Learn more about the modern Cherokee quest to reclaim stolen territory.)

The Cherokees’ refusal to cede any more territory provoked outrage in Georgia, which had surrendered its own westernmost lands to the federal government in 1802 in exchange for a promise that all Native Americans would be removed from its new borders. In the 1820s, Georgia systematically stripped legal and land protections from the Cherokee. Then, in 1829, a Georgia newspaper reported that gold had been discovered in Cherokee territory. Would-be gold miners inundated the land, and in 1830 the state officially stopped recognizing Cherokees’ legal rights.

Meanwhile, the federal government’s intent to strip Native American tribes of their territories had only grown. In 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act authorizing President Andrew Jackson to trade unsettled western lands in exchange for Native-held lands east of the Mississippi.

The Cherokee Nation decides to negotiate

These events caused deep fissures within the Cherokee nation. Faced with the possibility that Georgia and other southern states would continue chipping away at Cherokee lands and rights, a faction emerged that favored negotiating with the federal government.

Hoping to placate members of that faction, John Ross, the nation’s principal chief, told Jackson the Cherokee would only part with their lands for the then-astronomical sum of $20 million. Jackson rejected the proposal, and instead chose to negotiate with the more sympathetic Treaty Party, an organization of Cherokee elites that included Ross’s closest advisor and even his own brother.

In 1835, a small delegation of Treaty Party members met with federal representatives in the Cherokee capital of New Echota, Georgia, where they signed away all seven million acres of Cherokee territory east of the Mississippi River. In exchange for new land in what is now Oklahoma, the Cherokee got $5 million as well as a seat in the House of Representatives for a Cherokee delegate. (Read more about Sequoyah, the Native American-governed state that almost existed in present-day Oklahoma.)

Though the majority of Cherokee disapproved of the treaty, even petitioning Congress not to ratify it, their efforts were futile. In 1838, those who had resisted resettlement were driven from their homes and toward Indian Territory. The forced migration was grueling—and deadly—for about a quarter of the 16,000 Cherokee who walked the Trail of Tears.

Modern calls to enforce the treaty

Though many Cherokee people considered the treaty invalid at the time, it remains active today, and is the only document that guarantees a Native American nation a seat in Congress. But as with other treaties that were coerced, broken, underfunded, or simply ignored by the U.S government throughout history, the delegate portion of the Treaty of New Echota was never fulfilled. Though Cherokee representatives went to Washington to advocate for their tribe’s rights, Congress never took the formal action necessary to establish the designated seat.

Calls for the U.S. to seat a Cherokee delegate went unheeded over a century, but in 2019 the Cherokee Nation attempted to force the issue by officially nominating Teehee to the post. She is the first person the Cherokee Nation has named to the role. In September 2022, the tribe launched a new campaign to push the U.S. House of Representatives to seat Teehee. 

Legal and procedural issues could stand in the way of the movement. Some legal scholars have argued the treaty is so old it’s no longer in force (even though the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that an 1832 treaty with the Creek Nation is still legally binding). Others maintain that seating the delegate would give an unconstitutional “super-vote” to Cherokee Nation members in Oklahoma who already have state representation in Congress. Still others argue it would be unfair to give Cherokee members more Congressional standing than members of other Native American tribes and bands.

Even if Teehee were seated, it’s unclear what role she would have in the House of Representatives. The six existing non-voting members of Congress—hailing from the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands—serve on congressional committees, but their ability to participate in House votes has vacillated over the years.

The treaty’s legacy

Whether the push to add a Cherokee delegate to Congress succeeds or not, the nearly 200-year-old treaty and its unfulfilled promise shines an uncomfortable light on the long legacy of Native removal. For the Cherokee Nation, it’s also a chance to reassert Native sovereignty and insist upon the fulfillment of its treaty rights—even two centuries after its ratification. 

Though Native Americans have full U.S. citizenship and voting rights, the fight for full enfranchisement and representation has been long and difficult. A long list of barriers keeps many Native Americans from voting, including lack of language assistance, shortages of accessible polling places, and restrictive voter ID laws. (Reckoning with a century of trauma at U.S. boarding schools for Native American children.)

Nearly two centuries have elapsed since the U.S. and the Cherokee Nation entered into the Treaty of New Echota. But tribal leaders say it’s never too late to make good on an agreement that was so momentous to the Cherokee.

“The Treaty of New Echota has no expiration date,” the nation says on its website. “It’s time for the U.S. to fulfill its promise and uphold its legal obligation.”

Editor’s note:  This story has been updated to reflect the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma.

Read More